Two days after the final excited football market ended with the purchase of Alessandro Matri is the time to do the math. Take a calculator and follow us. First, starting from the last operation. We read everything and more. "It cost us 18 million, more than Pazzini" decisive statement to refute. Just take hand with the statement that Juventus have announced the purchase. Matri was acquired in loan charges amounted to 2.5 million to be paid during the current year, while the right of redemption, no duty is set at 15.5 million payable in three years. At the same time, was sold in the second half of the tag of Ariaudo which, coincidentally, was also assessed in 2.5 million generating a gain. Ultimately, the loan does not cost a Matri € to Juve, while 15 million, as acknowledged by Marotta treatable and can be lowered with the inclusion of other compensatory techniques. Broadening the discussion, taking a cue from a table that appeared in Juvelive.it by Graziano's recovery and also field from the blog "Bird of Del Piero," we can enter into the merits of the allegation made by Andrea Agnelli during a press conference last Saturday. This table shows that the annual cost of Amauri was 12 million, a figure disproportionate if it relates to its value and performance, Sissoko 7, nearly 9 Tiago, Iaquinta 8, Big 6. All players inherited from the previous disastrous economic management and sports Blanc and Secco: purchased substantially all the players were overpaid. Martinez E, "how do we pay him 12 million? Be ', the Uruguayan coast 6 million a year, a little' more than Grosso, while other purchases targati Marotta have the right impact on the cases eagle: Bonucci, 8, 4 million Storari half, ditto Barzagli 445, Krasic almost one million, Toni 4. Well, they are all players whose performance is as proportional as possible to their performance. Then we understand what it means when he says that Andrea Agnelli will be enough properly handle the 170 million annual cost of the machine Juve, to find the resources to invest in the market by buying good players. An example? Via Amauri and Iaquinta, 20 million saved by investing a great player, a champion. Via Sissoko and Tiago, 16, and this is an excellent midfielder. Sure, the game is not so simple because the players are convinced to change society, but we understand better how the market and what are the laws economic regulate it without being populist or whatever.
0 comments:
Post a Comment